Концерт чайковского для фортепиано номер 1

Piano Concerto in B♭ minor
No. 1
by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
Porträt des Komponisten Pjotr Tschaikowski (1840-1893).jpg

The composer, c. 1875
Opus 23
Composed 1874–75
Dedication Hans von Bülow
Performed 25 October 1875: Boston
Movements three
Audio samples

I. Allegro (18:47)

  • file
  • help

II. Andantino (6:28)

  • file
  • help

III. Allegro (6:10)

  • file
  • help
Gimn sbornoy Rossii

English: Anthem of Team Russia
Гимн сборной России

Official anthem of the Russian Olympic Committee and the Russian Paralympic Committee
Music Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, November 1874
Adopted 2021

The Piano Concerto No. 1 in B♭ minor, Op. 23, was composed by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky between November 1874 and February 1875.[1] It was revised in 1879 and in 1888. It was first performed on October 25, 1875, in Boston by Hans von Bülow after Tchaikovsky’s desired pianist, Nikolai Rubinstein, criticised the piece. Rubinstein later withdrew his criticism and became a fervent champion of the work. It is one of the most popular of Tchaikovsky’s compositions and among the best known of all piano concerti.[2]

From 2021 to 2022, it served as the sporting anthem of the Russian Olympic Committee as a substitute of the country’s actual national anthem as a result of the doping scandal that prohibits the use of its national symbols.

History[edit]

Tchaikovsky revised the concerto three times, the last in 1888, which is the version usually played. One of the most prominent differences between the original and final versions is that in the opening section, the chords played by the pianist, over which the orchestra plays the main theme, were originally written as arpeggios. Tchaikovsky also arranged the work for two pianos in December 1874; this edition was revised in 1888.[citation needed]

Disagreement with Rubinstein[edit]

There is some confusion about to whom the concerto was originally dedicated. It was long thought that Tchaikovsky initially dedicated the work to Nikolai Rubinstein, and Michael Steinberg writes that Rubinstein’s name is crossed off the autograph score.[3] But in his Tchaikovsky biography, David Brown writes that the work was never dedicated to Rubinstein.[4] Tchaikovsky did hope that Rubinstein would perform the work at one of the 1875 concerts of the Russian Musical Society in Moscow. For this reason he showed the work to him and another musical friend, Nikolai Hubert, at the Moscow Conservatory on December 24, 1874/January 5, 1875, three days after finishing it.[5] Brown writes, «This occasion has become one of the most notorious incidents in the composer’s biography.»[6] Three years later, Tchaikovsky shared what happened with his patroness, Nadezhda von Meck:

I played the first movement. Not a single word, not a single remark! If you knew how stupid and intolerable is the situation of a man who cooks and sets before a friend a meal, which he proceeds to eat in silence! Oh, for one word, for friendly attack, but for God’s sake one word of sympathy, even if not of praise. Rubinstein was amassing his storm, and Hubert was waiting to see what would happen, and that there would be a reason for joining one side or the other. Above all I did not want sentence on the artistic aspect. My need was for remarks about the virtuoso piano technique. R’s eloquent silence was of the greatest significance. He seemed to be saying: «My friend, how can I speak of detail when the whole thing is antipathetic?» I fortified myself with patience and played through to the end. Still silence. I stood up and asked, «Well?» Then a torrent poured from Nikolay Grigoryevich’s mouth, gentle at first, then more and more growing into the sound of a Jupiter Tonans. It turned out that my concerto was worthless and unplayable; passages were so fragmented, so clumsy, so badly written that they were beyond rescue; the work itself was bad, vulgar; in places I had stolen from other composers; only two or three pages were worth preserving; the rest must be thrown away or completely rewritten. «Here, for instance, this—now what’s all that?» (he caricatured my music on the piano) «And this? How can anyone …» etc., etc. The chief thing I can’t reproduce is the tone in which all this was uttered. In a word, a disinterested person in the room might have thought I was a maniac, a talented, senseless hack who had come to submit his rubbish to an eminent musician. Having noted my obstinate silence, Hubert was astonished and shocked that such a ticking off was being given to a man who had already written a great deal and given a course in free composition at the Conservatory, that such a contemptuous judgment without appeal was pronounced over him, such a judgment as you would not pronounce over a pupil with the slightest talent who had neglected some of his tasks—then he began to explain N.G.’s judgment, not disputing it in the least but just softening that which His Excellency had expressed with too little ceremony.

I was not only astounded but outraged by the whole scene. I am no longer a boy trying his hand at composition, and I no longer need lessons from anyone, especially when they are delivered so harshly and unfriendlily. I need and shall always need friendly criticism, but there was nothing resembling friendly criticism. It was indiscriminate, determined censure, delivered in such a way as to wound me to the quick. I left the room without a word and went upstairs. In my agitation and rage I could not say a thing. Presently R. enjoined me, and seeing how upset I was he asked me into one of the distant rooms. There he repeated that my concerto was impossible, pointed out many places where it would have to be completely revised, and said that if within a limited time I reworked the concerto according to his demands, then he would do me the honor of playing my thing at his concert. «I shall not alter a single note,» I answered, «I shall publish the work exactly as it is!» This I did.[7]

Tchaikovsky biographer John Warrack writes that, even if Tchaikovsky were restating the facts in his favor,

it was, at the very least, tactless of Rubinstein not to see how much he would upset the notoriously touchy Tchaikovsky. … It has, moreover, been a long-enduring habit for Russians, concerned about the role of their creative work, to introduce the concept of «correctness» as a major aesthetic consideration, hence to submit to direction and criticism in a way unfamiliar in the West, from Balakirev and Stasov organizing Tchaikovsky’s works according to plans of their own, to, in our own day, official intervention and the willingness of even major composers to pay attention to it.[8]

Warrack adds that Rubinstein’s criticisms fell into three categories. First, he thought the writing of the solo part was bad, «and certainly there are passages which even the greatest virtuoso is glad to survive unscathed, and others in which elaborate difficulties are almost inaudible beneath the orchestra.»[9] Second, he mentioned «outside influences and unevenness of invention … but it must be conceded that the music is uneven and that [it] would, like all works, seem the more uneven on a first hearing before its style had been properly understood.»[10] Third, the work probably sounded awkward to a conservative musician such as Rubinstein.[10] While the introduction in the «wrong» key of D♭ (for a piece supposed to be in B♭ minor) may have taken Rubinstein aback, Warrack explains, he may have been «precipitate in condemning the work on this account or for the formal structure of all that follows.»[10]

Hans von Bülow[edit]

Brown writes that it is not known why Tchaikovsky next approached German pianist Hans von Bülow to premiere the work,[4] although he had heard Bülow play in Moscow earlier in 1874 and been taken with his combination of intellect and passion; Bülow likewise admired Tchaikovsky’s music.[11] Bülow was preparing to go on a tour of the United States. This meant that the concerto would be premiered half a world away from Moscow. Brown suggests that Rubinstein’s comments may have deeply shaken Tchaikovsky, though he did not change the work and finished orchestrating it the following month, and that his confidence in the piece may have been so shaken that he wanted the public to hear it in a place where he would not have to personally endure any humiliation if it did not fare well.[4] Tchaikovsky dedicated the work to Bülow, who called it «so original and noble».

The first performance of the original version took place on October 25, 1875, in Boston, conducted by Benjamin Johnson Lang with Bülow as soloist. Bülow had initially engaged a different conductor, but they quarrelled, and Lang was brought in on short notice.[12] According to Alan Walker, the concerto was so popular that Bülow was obliged to repeat the Finale, a fact that Tchaikovsky found astonishing.[13] Although the premiere was a success with the audience, the critics were not so impressed. One wrote that the piece was «hardly destined ..to become classical».[14] George Whitefield Chadwick, who was in the audience, recalled in a memoir years later: «They had not rehearsed much and the trombones got in wrong in the ‘tutti’ in the middle of the first movement, whereupon Bülow sang out in a perfectly audible voice, The brass may go to hell«.[15] The work fared much better at its performance in New York City on November 22, under Leopold Damrosch.[16]

Lang appeared as soloist in a complete performance of the concerto with the Boston Symphony Orchestra on February 20, 1885, under Wilhelm Gericke.[12] Lang previously performed the first movement with the Boston Symphony Orchestra in March 1883, conducted by Georg Henschel, in a concert in Fitchburg, Massachusetts.

The Russian premiere took place on November 13 [O.S. November 1] 1875[17] in Saint Petersburg, with the Russian pianist Gustav Kross and the Czech conductor Eduard Nápravník. In Tchaikovsky’s estimation, Kross reduced the work to «an atrocious cacophony».[18] The Moscow premiere took place on December 3 [O.S. November 21] 1875, with Sergei Taneyev as soloist. The conductor was Rubinstein, the man who had comprehensively criticised the work less than a year earlier.[11] Rubinstein had come to see its merits, and played the solo part many times throughout Europe. He even insisted that Tchaikovsky entrust the premiere of his Second Piano Concerto to him, and the composer would have done so had Rubinstein not died.[citation needed] At that time, Tchaikovsky considered rededicating the work to Taneyev, who had performed it splendidly, but ultimately the dedication went to Bülow.

Publication of original version and subsequent revisions[edit]

In 1875, Tchaikovsky published the work in its original form,[19] but in 1876 he happily accepted advice on improving the piano writing from German pianist Edward Dannreuther, who had given the London premiere of the work,[20] and from Russian pianist Alexander Siloti several years later. The solid chords played by the soloist at the opening of the concerto may in fact have been Siloti’s idea, as they appear in the first (1875) edition as rolled chords, somewhat extended by the addition of one or sometimes two notes which made them more inconvenient to play but without significantly altering the sound of the passage. Various other slight simplifications were also incorporated into the published 1879 version. Further small revisions were undertaken for a new edition published in 1890.

The American pianist Malcolm Frager unearthed and performed the original version of the concerto.[21][when?]

In 2015, Kirill Gerstein made the world premiere recording of the 1879 version. It received an ECHO Klassik award in the Concerto Recording of the Year category. Based on Tchaikovsky’s conducting score from his last public concert, the new critical urtext edition was published in 2015 by the Tchaikovsky Museum in Klin, tying in with Tchaikovsky’s 175th anniversary and marking 140 years since the concerto’s world premiere in Boston in 1875. For the recording, Gerstein was granted special pre-publication access to the new urtext edition.[22]

Anthem of Team Russia[edit]

After Russia was banned from all major sporting competitions from 2021 to 2023 by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a result of a doping scandal, those cleared to compete were allowed to represent the Russian Olympic Committee or Russian Paralympic Committee at the 2020 Summer Olympics and Paralympics,[a] and at the 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympics. Instead of the national anthem of Russia, a fragment of the concerto was used as the «Anthem of Team Russia» when athletes competing under the banner were awarded a gold medal. The introduction to the first movement had been played during the closing ceremony of the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, and during the final leg of the Olympic torch relay during the Opening Ceremony of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow.[23][24][25][26]

Instrumentation[edit]

The work is scored for two flutes, two oboes, two clarinets in B♭, two bassoons, four horns in F, two trumpets in F, three trombones (two tenor, one bass), timpani, solo piano, and strings.

Structure[edit]

The concerto follows the traditional form of three movements:

  1. Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso – Allegro con spirito (B♭ minor – B♭ major)
  2. Andantino semplice – Prestissimo – Tempo I (D♭ major)
  3. Allegro con fuoco – Molto meno mosso – Allegro vivo (B♭ minor – B♭ major)

A standard performance lasts between 30 and 36 minutes, the majority of which is taken up by the first movement.

I. Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso – Allegro con spirito[edit]

The first movement starts with a short horn theme in B♭ minor, accompanied by orchestral chords that quickly modulate to the lyrical and passionate theme in D♭ major. This subsidiary theme is heard three times, the last of which is preceded by a piano cadenza,[27] and never appears again throughout the movement. The introduction ends in a subdued manner. The exposition proper then begins in the concerto’s tonic minor key, with a Ukrainian folk theme based on a melody that Tchaikovsky heard performed by blind lirnyks at a market in Kamianka (near Kyiv). A short transitional passage is a call and response section on the tutti and the piano, alternating between high and low registers. The second subject group consists of two alternating themes, the first of which features some of the melodic contours from the introduction. This is answered by a smoother and more consoling second theme, played by the strings and set in the subtonic key (A♭ major) over a pedal point, before a more turbulent reappearance of the woodwind theme, this time reinforced by driving piano arpeggios, gradually builds to a stormy climax in C minor that ends in a perfect cadence on the piano. After a short pause, a closing section, based on a variation of the consoling theme, closes the exposition in A♭ major.[28]

The development section transforms this theme into an ominously building sequence, punctuated with snatches of the first subject material. After a flurry of piano octaves, fragments of the «plaintive» theme are revisited for the first time in E♭ major, then for the second time in G minor. Then the piano and the strings take turns playing the theme for the third time in E major while the timpani furtively plays a tremolo on a low B until the first subject’s fragments are continued.

The recapitulation features an abridged version of the first subject, working around to C minor for the transition section. In the second subject group, the consoling second theme is omitted; instead the first theme repeats, with a reappearance of the stormy climactic build previously heard in the exposition, but this time in B♭ major. The excitement is cut short by a deceptive cadence. A brief closing section comprises G-flat major chords played by the whole orchestra and the piano. Then a piano cadenza appears, the second half of which contains subdued snatches of the second subject group’s first theme in the work’s original minor key. B♭ major is restored in the coda, when the orchestra reenters with the second subject group’s second theme; the tension then gradually builds, leading to a triumphant conclusion, ending with a plagal cadence.

Question of the introduction[edit]

Introduction’s theme, as played on the piano

The introduction’s theme is notable for its apparent formal independence from the rest of the movement and the concerto as a whole, especially given its setting not in the work’s nominal key of B♭ minor but rather in D♭ major, that key’s relative major. Despite its very substantial nature, this theme is only heard twice, and it never reappears at any later point in the concerto.[29]

Russian music historian Francis Maes writes that because of its independence from the rest of the work,

For a long time, the introduction posed an enigma to analysts and critics alike. … The key to the link between the introduction and what follows is … Tchaikovsky’s gift of hiding motivic connections behind what appears to be a flash of melodic inspiration. The opening melody comprises the most important motivic core elements for the entire work, something that is not immediately obvious, owing to its lyric quality. However, a closer analysis shows that the themes of the three movements are subtly linked. Tchaikovsky presents his structural material in a spontaneous, lyrical manner, yet with a high degree of planning and calculation.[30]

Maes adds that all the themes are tied together by a strong motivic link. These themes include the Ukrainian folk song «Oi, kriache, kriache, ta y chornenkyi voron …» as the first theme of the first movement proper; the French chansonette «Il faut s’amuser, danser et rire» («One must have fun, dance and laugh») in the middle section of the second movement; and a Ukrainian vesnianka «Vyidy, vyidy, Ivanku» or greeting to spring which appears as the first theme of the finale. The second theme of the finale is motivically derived from the Russian folk song «Poydu, poydu vo Tsar-Gorod» («I’m Coming to the Capital»)[31] and also shares this motivic bond. The relationship between them has often been ascribed to chance because they were all well-known songs at the time Tchaikovsky composed the concerto. But it seems likely that he used these songs precisely because of their motivic connection. «Selecting folkloristic material,» Maes writes, «went hand in hand with planning the large-scale structure of the work.»[32]

All this is in line with the earlier analysis of the concerto by Tchaikovsky authority David Brown, who further suggests that Alexander Borodin’s First Symphony may have given Tchaikovsky both the idea to write such an introduction and to link the work motivically as he does. Brown also identifies a four-note musical phrase ciphered from Tchaikovsky’s own name and a three-note phrase likewise taken from the name of soprano Désirée Artôt, to whom the composer had been engaged some years before.[33]

II. Andantino semplice – Prestissimo – Tempo I[edit]

The second movement, in D♭ major, is in 6
8 time. The tempo marking, «andantino semplice», lends itself to a range of interpretations; the World War II-era recording by Vladimir Horowitz and Arturo Toscanini completed the movement in under six minutes,[34] while toward the other extreme, Lang Lang recorded the movement with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra conducted by Daniel Barenboim in eight minutes.[35]

  • Measures 1–58: Andantino semplice
  • Measures 59–145: Prestissimo
  • Measures 146–170: Tempo I

After a brief pizzicato introduction, the flute carries the first statement of the theme. The flute’s opening four notes are A♭–E♭–F–A♭, while each other statement of this motif in the remainder of the movement substitutes the F for a (higher) B♭. The British pianist Stephen Hough suggests this may be an error in the published score, and that the flute should play a B♭.[36] After the flute’s opening statement of the melody, the piano continues and modulates to F major. After a bridge section, two cellos return with the theme in D♭ major and the oboe continues it. The A section ends with the piano holding a high F major chord, pianissimo. The movement’s B section is in D minor (the relative minor of F major) and marked «allegro vivace assai» or «prestissimo», depending on the edition. It commences with a virtuosic piano introduction before the piano assumes an accompanying role and the strings commence a new melody in D major. The B section ends with another virtuosic solo piano passage, leading into the return of the A section. In the return, the piano makes the first, now ornamented, statement of the theme. The oboe continues the theme, this time resolving it to the tonic (D♭ major) and setting up a brief coda which finishes ppp on another plagal cadence.

III. Allegro con fuoco – Molto meno mosso – Allegro vivo[edit]

The final movement, in rondo form, starts with a very brief introduction. The A theme, in B♭ minor, is march-like and upbeat. This melody is played by the piano until the orchestra plays a variation of it ff. The B theme, in D♭ major, is more lyrical and the melody is first played by the violins, and by the piano second. A set of descending scales leads to the abridged version of the A theme.

The C theme is heard afterward, modulating through various keys, containing dotted rhythm, and a piano solo leads to:

The later measures of the A section are heard, and then the B appears, this time in E♭ major. Another set of descending scales leads to the A once more. This time, it ends with a half cadence on a secondary dominant, in which the coda starts. An urgent buildup leads to a sudden crash with F major octaves as a transition point to the last B♭ major melody played along with the orchestra, and it fuses into a dramatic and extended climactic episode, gradually building to a dominant prolongation. Then the melodies from the B theme are heard in B♭ major. After that, the final part of the coda, marked allegro vivo, draws the work to a conclusion on a perfect authentic cadence.

Notable performances[edit]

  • On March 22 [O.S. March 1], 1878, Nikolai Rubenstein, who had initially rejected the piece before coming to see its value, finally performed the concerto as the pianist in Moscow, with Eduard Langer conducting. Rubenstein subsequently played the piece in two more cities that same year: in Palais du Trocadéro (Paris), with Édouard Colonne conducting, and in St. Petersburg.
  • Theodore Thomas programmed the concerto for the first concerts of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, given on 16 and 17 October 1891. Rafael Joseffy was the soloist.[37] Joseffy had previously performed the piece in January 1888 at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York.
  • Wassily Sapellnikoff, who played the concerto many times with Tchaikovsky himself conducting, made a record in 1926 with Aeolian Orchestra under Stanley Chapple.[38]
  • Arthur Rubinstein recorded the concerto five times: with John Barbirolli in 1932; with Dmitri Mitropoulos in 1946; with Artur Rodzinski live in 1946; with Carlo Maria Giulini in 1961; and with Erich Leinsdorf in 1963.
  • Solomon recorded the concerto thrice, most notably with Philharmonia Orchestra under Issay Dobrowen in 1949.
  • Egon Petri in 1937 with London Philharmonic Orchestra under Walter Goehr.
  • Vladimir Horowitz performed this piece as part of a World War II fundraising concert in 1943, with his father-in-law, the conductor Arturo Toscanini, conducting the NBC Symphony Orchestra. Two performances of Horowitz playing the concerto and Toscanini conducting were eventually released on records and CDs – the live 1943 rendition, and an earlier studio recording made in 1941.
  • Van Cliburn won the First International Tchaikovsky Competition in 1958 with this piece, surprising some people, as he was an American competing in Moscow at the height of the Cold War. He received an 8 minute standing ovation for this performance. His subsequent RCA LP recording with Kirill Kondrashin was the first classical LP to go platinum.
  • Emil Gilels recorded the concerto more than a dozen times, both live and in studio. The studio recording with Fritz Reiner and the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in 1955, and his performance in Portugal, in 1961, with the Portuguese Radio Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Pedro de Freitas Branco, are very well regarded.
  • Sviatoslav Richter in 1962 with Herbert von Karajan and the Vienna Symphony Orchestra. Richter also made recordings in 1954, 1957, 1958 and 1968.
  • Lazar Berman recorded the concerto in studio with Berlin Philharmonic under Herbert von Karajan in 1975 playing the revised version, and live in 1986 with Yuri Temirkanov playing the original version of 1875.[39]
  • Claudio Arrau recorded the concerto twice, once in 1960 with Alceo Galliera and the Philharmonia Orchestra and again in 1979 with Sir Colin Davis and the Boston Symphony Orchestra.
  • Martha Argerich recorded the concerto in 1971 with Charles Dutoit and the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. She also recorded it in 1980 with Kirill Kondrashin and the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra, as well as in 1994 with Claudio Abbado and the Berlin Philharmonic.
  • Horacio Gutiérrez’s performance of this piece at the International Tchaikovsky Competition (1970) resulted in a silver medal. He later recorded with the Baltimore Symphony and David Zinman.
  • Vladimir Ashkenazy recorded the concerto in 1963 with Lorin Maazel and the London Symphony Orchestra.
  • Evgeny Kissin performed and recorded the concerto live with Herbert von Karajan during New Year’s Eve Concert in 1988, being one of the last recordings of the maestro.
  • Stanislav Ioudenitch won the gold medal at the Van Cliburn International Piano Competition in 2001 performing this concerto with the Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra and James Conlon in the final round. His live recording of this concerto from the final round is available on the DVD The Cliburn: Playing on the Edge.
  • Andrej Hoteev recorded 2021 the original version with Vladimir Fedoseyev and the Tchaikovsky Symphony Orchestra.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Rescheduled and held a year later in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic

References[edit]

  1. ^ Maes, 75.
  2. ^ Steinberg, 480.
  3. ^ Steinberg, 477.
  4. ^ a b c Brown, Crisis Years, 18.
  5. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 16—17.
  6. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 17.
  7. ^ As quoted in Warrack, 78–79.
  8. ^ Warrack, 79.
  9. ^ Warrack, 79–80.
  10. ^ a b c Warrack, 80.
  11. ^ a b Steinberg, 476.
  12. ^ a b Margaret Ruthven Lang & Family Archived 2005-02-04 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ Alan Walker (2009). Hans von Bülow: A life and times. Oxford University Press. p. 213. ISBN 9780195368680.
  14. ^ Naxos[permanent dead link]
  15. ^ Steven Ledbetter, notes for Colorado Symphony Orchestra Archived 2008-12-16 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ^ Alan Walker (2009), p. 219
  17. ^ Tchaikovsky Research
  18. ^ Alexander Poznansky, Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man, p. 166
  19. ^ Steinberg, 475.
  20. ^ Steinberg, 475—476.
  21. ^ All Music; Rogert Dettmer biography of Malcolm Frager. Retrieved 29 May 2014
  22. ^ BBC Music Magazine – Artist Interview: Kirill Gerstein, February 2015
  23. ^ «Tchaikovsky Selection To Replace Banned Russian Anthem At Tokyo, Beijing Olympics». RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  24. ^ «WADA lawyer defends lack of blanket ban on Russia». The Japan Times. AP. 13 December 2019. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
  25. ^ «Russia Confirms It Will Appeal 4-Year Olympic Ban». Time. AP. 27 December 2019. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019.
  26. ^ Dunbar, Graham (17 December 2020). «Russia can’t use its name and flag at the next 2 Olympics». Associated Press. Retrieved 17 December 2020.
  27. ^ Borg-Wheeler 2016.
  28. ^ Frivola-Walker 2010.
  29. ^ Steinberg, 477–478.
  30. ^ See J. Norris, The Russian Piano Concerto, 1:114–151. As cited in Maes, 76.
  31. ^ «50 Russian Folk Songs (Tchaikovsky, Pyotr) — IMSLP». imslp.org. Retrieved 2021-03-20.
  32. ^ Maes, 76.
  33. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 22–24.
  34. ^ «Brahms / Tchaikovsky: Piano Concertos (Horowitz) (1940–1941)». Naxos Records. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  35. ^ «Lang Lang / Mendelssohn, Tchaikovsky». Deutsche Grammophon. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  36. ^ Hough, Stephen (27 June 2013). «STOP PRESS: a different mistake but a more convincing solution in Tchaikovsky’s concerto». The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 1 July 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  37. ^ «125 Moments: 125 First Concert». 15 October 2016.
  38. ^ «Piano Concerto No. 1: Recordings — Tchaikovsky Research».
  39. ^ «Piano Concerto No. 1: Recordings — Tchaikovsky Research».

Sources[edit]

  • Borg-Wheeler, Phillip (2016). Tchaikovsky: Piano Concerto No 1 & Nutcracker Suite – Pyotr Tchaikovsky (1840–1893) (CD). Hyperion Records. SIGCD441.
  • Brown, David, Tchaikovsky: The Crisis Years, 1874–1878, (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1983). ISBN 0-393-01707-9.
  • Friskin, James, «The Text of Tchaikovsky’s B-flat-minor Concerto,» Music & Letters 50(2):246–251 (1969).
  • Frivola-Walker, Marina (2010). Pyotr Tchaikovsky (1840–1893): Piano Concerto No 1 in B-flat minor, Op 23 (CD). Hyperion Records. W10153.
  • Maes, Francis, tr. Arnold J. Pomerans and Erica Pomerans, A History of Russian Music: From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2002). ISBN 0-520-21815-9.
  • Norris, Jeremy, The Russian Piano Concerto (Bloomington, 1994), Vol. 1: The Nineteenth Century. ISBN 0-253-34112-4.
  • Poznansky, Alexander Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man (New York: Schirmer Books, 1991). ISBN 0-02-871885-2.
  • Serotsky, Paul (2000). Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Op. 23 (CD). Round Top Records. RTR006.
  • Steinberg, M. The Concerto: A Listener’s Guide, Oxford (1998). ISBN 0-19-510330-0.
  • Warrack, John, Tchaikovsky (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973). ISBN 0-684-13558-2.

External links[edit]

  • Media related to Piano Concerto No. 1 (Tchaikovsky) at Wikimedia Commons
  • Piano Concerto No. 1: Scores at the International Music Score Library Project
  • Tchaikovsky Research
Источник
Piano Concerto in B♭ minor
No. 1
by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
Porträt des Komponisten Pjotr Tschaikowski (1840-1893).jpg

The composer, c. 1875
Opus 23
Composed 1874–75
Dedication Hans von Bülow
Performed 25 October 1875: Boston
Movements three
Audio samples

I. Allegro (18:47)

  • file
  • help

II. Andantino (6:28)

  • file
  • help

III. Allegro (6:10)

  • file
  • help
Gimn sbornoy Rossii

English: Anthem of Team Russia
Гимн сборной России

Official anthem of the Russian Olympic Committee and the Russian Paralympic Committee
Music Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, November 1874
Adopted 2021

The Piano Concerto No. 1 in B♭ minor, Op. 23, was composed by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky between November 1874 and February 1875.[1] It was revised in 1879 and in 1888. It was first performed on October 25, 1875, in Boston by Hans von Bülow after Tchaikovsky’s desired pianist, Nikolai Rubinstein, criticised the piece. Rubinstein later withdrew his criticism and became a fervent champion of the work. It is one of the most popular of Tchaikovsky’s compositions and among the best known of all piano concerti.[2]

From 2021 to 2022, it served as the sporting anthem of the Russian Olympic Committee as a substitute of the country’s actual national anthem as a result of the doping scandal that prohibits the use of its national symbols.

History[edit]

Tchaikovsky revised the concerto three times, the last in 1888, which is the version usually played. One of the most prominent differences between the original and final versions is that in the opening section, the chords played by the pianist, over which the orchestra plays the main theme, were originally written as arpeggios. Tchaikovsky also arranged the work for two pianos in December 1874; this edition was revised in 1888.[citation needed]

Disagreement with Rubinstein[edit]

There is some confusion about to whom the concerto was originally dedicated. It was long thought that Tchaikovsky initially dedicated the work to Nikolai Rubinstein, and Michael Steinberg writes that Rubinstein’s name is crossed off the autograph score.[3] But in his Tchaikovsky biography, David Brown writes that the work was never dedicated to Rubinstein.[4] Tchaikovsky did hope that Rubinstein would perform the work at one of the 1875 concerts of the Russian Musical Society in Moscow. For this reason he showed the work to him and another musical friend, Nikolai Hubert, at the Moscow Conservatory on December 24, 1874/January 5, 1875, three days after finishing it.[5] Brown writes, «This occasion has become one of the most notorious incidents in the composer’s biography.»[6] Three years later, Tchaikovsky shared what happened with his patroness, Nadezhda von Meck:

I played the first movement. Not a single word, not a single remark! If you knew how stupid and intolerable is the situation of a man who cooks and sets before a friend a meal, which he proceeds to eat in silence! Oh, for one word, for friendly attack, but for God’s sake one word of sympathy, even if not of praise. Rubinstein was amassing his storm, and Hubert was waiting to see what would happen, and that there would be a reason for joining one side or the other. Above all I did not want sentence on the artistic aspect. My need was for remarks about the virtuoso piano technique. R’s eloquent silence was of the greatest significance. He seemed to be saying: «My friend, how can I speak of detail when the whole thing is antipathetic?» I fortified myself with patience and played through to the end. Still silence. I stood up and asked, «Well?» Then a torrent poured from Nikolay Grigoryevich’s mouth, gentle at first, then more and more growing into the sound of a Jupiter Tonans. It turned out that my concerto was worthless and unplayable; passages were so fragmented, so clumsy, so badly written that they were beyond rescue; the work itself was bad, vulgar; in places I had stolen from other composers; only two or three pages were worth preserving; the rest must be thrown away or completely rewritten. «Here, for instance, this—now what’s all that?» (he caricatured my music on the piano) «And this? How can anyone …» etc., etc. The chief thing I can’t reproduce is the tone in which all this was uttered. In a word, a disinterested person in the room might have thought I was a maniac, a talented, senseless hack who had come to submit his rubbish to an eminent musician. Having noted my obstinate silence, Hubert was astonished and shocked that such a ticking off was being given to a man who had already written a great deal and given a course in free composition at the Conservatory, that such a contemptuous judgment without appeal was pronounced over him, such a judgment as you would not pronounce over a pupil with the slightest talent who had neglected some of his tasks—then he began to explain N.G.’s judgment, not disputing it in the least but just softening that which His Excellency had expressed with too little ceremony.

I was not only astounded but outraged by the whole scene. I am no longer a boy trying his hand at composition, and I no longer need lessons from anyone, especially when they are delivered so harshly and unfriendlily. I need and shall always need friendly criticism, but there was nothing resembling friendly criticism. It was indiscriminate, determined censure, delivered in such a way as to wound me to the quick. I left the room without a word and went upstairs. In my agitation and rage I could not say a thing. Presently R. enjoined me, and seeing how upset I was he asked me into one of the distant rooms. There he repeated that my concerto was impossible, pointed out many places where it would have to be completely revised, and said that if within a limited time I reworked the concerto according to his demands, then he would do me the honor of playing my thing at his concert. «I shall not alter a single note,» I answered, «I shall publish the work exactly as it is!» This I did.[7]

Tchaikovsky biographer John Warrack writes that, even if Tchaikovsky were restating the facts in his favor,

it was, at the very least, tactless of Rubinstein not to see how much he would upset the notoriously touchy Tchaikovsky. … It has, moreover, been a long-enduring habit for Russians, concerned about the role of their creative work, to introduce the concept of «correctness» as a major aesthetic consideration, hence to submit to direction and criticism in a way unfamiliar in the West, from Balakirev and Stasov organizing Tchaikovsky’s works according to plans of their own, to, in our own day, official intervention and the willingness of even major composers to pay attention to it.[8]

Warrack adds that Rubinstein’s criticisms fell into three categories. First, he thought the writing of the solo part was bad, «and certainly there are passages which even the greatest virtuoso is glad to survive unscathed, and others in which elaborate difficulties are almost inaudible beneath the orchestra.»[9] Second, he mentioned «outside influences and unevenness of invention … but it must be conceded that the music is uneven and that [it] would, like all works, seem the more uneven on a first hearing before its style had been properly understood.»[10] Third, the work probably sounded awkward to a conservative musician such as Rubinstein.[10] While the introduction in the «wrong» key of D♭ (for a piece supposed to be in B♭ minor) may have taken Rubinstein aback, Warrack explains, he may have been «precipitate in condemning the work on this account or for the formal structure of all that follows.»[10]

Hans von Bülow[edit]

Brown writes that it is not known why Tchaikovsky next approached German pianist Hans von Bülow to premiere the work,[4] although he had heard Bülow play in Moscow earlier in 1874 and been taken with his combination of intellect and passion; Bülow likewise admired Tchaikovsky’s music.[11] Bülow was preparing to go on a tour of the United States. This meant that the concerto would be premiered half a world away from Moscow. Brown suggests that Rubinstein’s comments may have deeply shaken Tchaikovsky, though he did not change the work and finished orchestrating it the following month, and that his confidence in the piece may have been so shaken that he wanted the public to hear it in a place where he would not have to personally endure any humiliation if it did not fare well.[4] Tchaikovsky dedicated the work to Bülow, who called it «so original and noble».

The first performance of the original version took place on October 25, 1875, in Boston, conducted by Benjamin Johnson Lang with Bülow as soloist. Bülow had initially engaged a different conductor, but they quarrelled, and Lang was brought in on short notice.[12] According to Alan Walker, the concerto was so popular that Bülow was obliged to repeat the Finale, a fact that Tchaikovsky found astonishing.[13] Although the premiere was a success with the audience, the critics were not so impressed. One wrote that the piece was «hardly destined ..to become classical».[14] George Whitefield Chadwick, who was in the audience, recalled in a memoir years later: «They had not rehearsed much and the trombones got in wrong in the ‘tutti’ in the middle of the first movement, whereupon Bülow sang out in a perfectly audible voice, The brass may go to hell«.[15] The work fared much better at its performance in New York City on November 22, under Leopold Damrosch.[16]

Lang appeared as soloist in a complete performance of the concerto with the Boston Symphony Orchestra on February 20, 1885, under Wilhelm Gericke.[12] Lang previously performed the first movement with the Boston Symphony Orchestra in March 1883, conducted by Georg Henschel, in a concert in Fitchburg, Massachusetts.

The Russian premiere took place on November 13 [O.S. November 1] 1875[17] in Saint Petersburg, with the Russian pianist Gustav Kross and the Czech conductor Eduard Nápravník. In Tchaikovsky’s estimation, Kross reduced the work to «an atrocious cacophony».[18] The Moscow premiere took place on December 3 [O.S. November 21] 1875, with Sergei Taneyev as soloist. The conductor was Rubinstein, the man who had comprehensively criticised the work less than a year earlier.[11] Rubinstein had come to see its merits, and played the solo part many times throughout Europe. He even insisted that Tchaikovsky entrust the premiere of his Second Piano Concerto to him, and the composer would have done so had Rubinstein not died.[citation needed] At that time, Tchaikovsky considered rededicating the work to Taneyev, who had performed it splendidly, but ultimately the dedication went to Bülow.

Publication of original version and subsequent revisions[edit]

In 1875, Tchaikovsky published the work in its original form,[19] but in 1876 he happily accepted advice on improving the piano writing from German pianist Edward Dannreuther, who had given the London premiere of the work,[20] and from Russian pianist Alexander Siloti several years later. The solid chords played by the soloist at the opening of the concerto may in fact have been Siloti’s idea, as they appear in the first (1875) edition as rolled chords, somewhat extended by the addition of one or sometimes two notes which made them more inconvenient to play but without significantly altering the sound of the passage. Various other slight simplifications were also incorporated into the published 1879 version. Further small revisions were undertaken for a new edition published in 1890.

The American pianist Malcolm Frager unearthed and performed the original version of the concerto.[21][when?]

In 2015, Kirill Gerstein made the world premiere recording of the 1879 version. It received an ECHO Klassik award in the Concerto Recording of the Year category. Based on Tchaikovsky’s conducting score from his last public concert, the new critical urtext edition was published in 2015 by the Tchaikovsky Museum in Klin, tying in with Tchaikovsky’s 175th anniversary and marking 140 years since the concerto’s world premiere in Boston in 1875. For the recording, Gerstein was granted special pre-publication access to the new urtext edition.[22]

Anthem of Team Russia[edit]

After Russia was banned from all major sporting competitions from 2021 to 2023 by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a result of a doping scandal, those cleared to compete were allowed to represent the Russian Olympic Committee or Russian Paralympic Committee at the 2020 Summer Olympics and Paralympics,[a] and at the 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympics. Instead of the national anthem of Russia, a fragment of the concerto was used as the «Anthem of Team Russia» when athletes competing under the banner were awarded a gold medal. The introduction to the first movement had been played during the closing ceremony of the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, and during the final leg of the Olympic torch relay during the Opening Ceremony of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow.[23][24][25][26]

Instrumentation[edit]

The work is scored for two flutes, two oboes, two clarinets in B♭, two bassoons, four horns in F, two trumpets in F, three trombones (two tenor, one bass), timpani, solo piano, and strings.

Structure[edit]

The concerto follows the traditional form of three movements:

  1. Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso – Allegro con spirito (B♭ minor – B♭ major)
  2. Andantino semplice – Prestissimo – Tempo I (D♭ major)
  3. Allegro con fuoco – Molto meno mosso – Allegro vivo (B♭ minor – B♭ major)

A standard performance lasts between 30 and 36 minutes, the majority of which is taken up by the first movement.

I. Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso – Allegro con spirito[edit]

The first movement starts with a short horn theme in B♭ minor, accompanied by orchestral chords that quickly modulate to the lyrical and passionate theme in D♭ major. This subsidiary theme is heard three times, the last of which is preceded by a piano cadenza,[27] and never appears again throughout the movement. The introduction ends in a subdued manner. The exposition proper then begins in the concerto’s tonic minor key, with a Ukrainian folk theme based on a melody that Tchaikovsky heard performed by blind lirnyks at a market in Kamianka (near Kyiv). A short transitional passage is a call and response section on the tutti and the piano, alternating between high and low registers. The second subject group consists of two alternating themes, the first of which features some of the melodic contours from the introduction. This is answered by a smoother and more consoling second theme, played by the strings and set in the subtonic key (A♭ major) over a pedal point, before a more turbulent reappearance of the woodwind theme, this time reinforced by driving piano arpeggios, gradually builds to a stormy climax in C minor that ends in a perfect cadence on the piano. After a short pause, a closing section, based on a variation of the consoling theme, closes the exposition in A♭ major.[28]

The development section transforms this theme into an ominously building sequence, punctuated with snatches of the first subject material. After a flurry of piano octaves, fragments of the «plaintive» theme are revisited for the first time in E♭ major, then for the second time in G minor. Then the piano and the strings take turns playing the theme for the third time in E major while the timpani furtively plays a tremolo on a low B until the first subject’s fragments are continued.

The recapitulation features an abridged version of the first subject, working around to C minor for the transition section. In the second subject group, the consoling second theme is omitted; instead the first theme repeats, with a reappearance of the stormy climactic build previously heard in the exposition, but this time in B♭ major. The excitement is cut short by a deceptive cadence. A brief closing section comprises G-flat major chords played by the whole orchestra and the piano. Then a piano cadenza appears, the second half of which contains subdued snatches of the second subject group’s first theme in the work’s original minor key. B♭ major is restored in the coda, when the orchestra reenters with the second subject group’s second theme; the tension then gradually builds, leading to a triumphant conclusion, ending with a plagal cadence.

Question of the introduction[edit]

Introduction’s theme, as played on the piano

The introduction’s theme is notable for its apparent formal independence from the rest of the movement and the concerto as a whole, especially given its setting not in the work’s nominal key of B♭ minor but rather in D♭ major, that key’s relative major. Despite its very substantial nature, this theme is only heard twice, and it never reappears at any later point in the concerto.[29]

Russian music historian Francis Maes writes that because of its independence from the rest of the work,

For a long time, the introduction posed an enigma to analysts and critics alike. … The key to the link between the introduction and what follows is … Tchaikovsky’s gift of hiding motivic connections behind what appears to be a flash of melodic inspiration. The opening melody comprises the most important motivic core elements for the entire work, something that is not immediately obvious, owing to its lyric quality. However, a closer analysis shows that the themes of the three movements are subtly linked. Tchaikovsky presents his structural material in a spontaneous, lyrical manner, yet with a high degree of planning and calculation.[30]

Maes adds that all the themes are tied together by a strong motivic link. These themes include the Ukrainian folk song «Oi, kriache, kriache, ta y chornenkyi voron …» as the first theme of the first movement proper; the French chansonette «Il faut s’amuser, danser et rire» («One must have fun, dance and laugh») in the middle section of the second movement; and a Ukrainian vesnianka «Vyidy, vyidy, Ivanku» or greeting to spring which appears as the first theme of the finale. The second theme of the finale is motivically derived from the Russian folk song «Poydu, poydu vo Tsar-Gorod» («I’m Coming to the Capital»)[31] and also shares this motivic bond. The relationship between them has often been ascribed to chance because they were all well-known songs at the time Tchaikovsky composed the concerto. But it seems likely that he used these songs precisely because of their motivic connection. «Selecting folkloristic material,» Maes writes, «went hand in hand with planning the large-scale structure of the work.»[32]

All this is in line with the earlier analysis of the concerto by Tchaikovsky authority David Brown, who further suggests that Alexander Borodin’s First Symphony may have given Tchaikovsky both the idea to write such an introduction and to link the work motivically as he does. Brown also identifies a four-note musical phrase ciphered from Tchaikovsky’s own name and a three-note phrase likewise taken from the name of soprano Désirée Artôt, to whom the composer had been engaged some years before.[33]

II. Andantino semplice – Prestissimo – Tempo I[edit]

The second movement, in D♭ major, is in 6
8 time. The tempo marking, «andantino semplice», lends itself to a range of interpretations; the World War II-era recording by Vladimir Horowitz and Arturo Toscanini completed the movement in under six minutes,[34] while toward the other extreme, Lang Lang recorded the movement with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra conducted by Daniel Barenboim in eight minutes.[35]

  • Measures 1–58: Andantino semplice
  • Measures 59–145: Prestissimo
  • Measures 146–170: Tempo I

After a brief pizzicato introduction, the flute carries the first statement of the theme. The flute’s opening four notes are A♭–E♭–F–A♭, while each other statement of this motif in the remainder of the movement substitutes the F for a (higher) B♭. The British pianist Stephen Hough suggests this may be an error in the published score, and that the flute should play a B♭.[36] After the flute’s opening statement of the melody, the piano continues and modulates to F major. After a bridge section, two cellos return with the theme in D♭ major and the oboe continues it. The A section ends with the piano holding a high F major chord, pianissimo. The movement’s B section is in D minor (the relative minor of F major) and marked «allegro vivace assai» or «prestissimo», depending on the edition. It commences with a virtuosic piano introduction before the piano assumes an accompanying role and the strings commence a new melody in D major. The B section ends with another virtuosic solo piano passage, leading into the return of the A section. In the return, the piano makes the first, now ornamented, statement of the theme. The oboe continues the theme, this time resolving it to the tonic (D♭ major) and setting up a brief coda which finishes ppp on another plagal cadence.

III. Allegro con fuoco – Molto meno mosso – Allegro vivo[edit]

The final movement, in rondo form, starts with a very brief introduction. The A theme, in B♭ minor, is march-like and upbeat. This melody is played by the piano until the orchestra plays a variation of it ff. The B theme, in D♭ major, is more lyrical and the melody is first played by the violins, and by the piano second. A set of descending scales leads to the abridged version of the A theme.

The C theme is heard afterward, modulating through various keys, containing dotted rhythm, and a piano solo leads to:

The later measures of the A section are heard, and then the B appears, this time in E♭ major. Another set of descending scales leads to the A once more. This time, it ends with a half cadence on a secondary dominant, in which the coda starts. An urgent buildup leads to a sudden crash with F major octaves as a transition point to the last B♭ major melody played along with the orchestra, and it fuses into a dramatic and extended climactic episode, gradually building to a dominant prolongation. Then the melodies from the B theme are heard in B♭ major. After that, the final part of the coda, marked allegro vivo, draws the work to a conclusion on a perfect authentic cadence.

Notable performances[edit]

  • On March 22 [O.S. March 1], 1878, Nikolai Rubenstein, who had initially rejected the piece before coming to see its value, finally performed the concerto as the pianist in Moscow, with Eduard Langer conducting. Rubenstein subsequently played the piece in two more cities that same year: in Palais du Trocadéro (Paris), with Édouard Colonne conducting, and in St. Petersburg.
  • Theodore Thomas programmed the concerto for the first concerts of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, given on 16 and 17 October 1891. Rafael Joseffy was the soloist.[37] Joseffy had previously performed the piece in January 1888 at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York.
  • Wassily Sapellnikoff, who played the concerto many times with Tchaikovsky himself conducting, made a record in 1926 with Aeolian Orchestra under Stanley Chapple.[38]
  • Arthur Rubinstein recorded the concerto five times: with John Barbirolli in 1932; with Dmitri Mitropoulos in 1946; with Artur Rodzinski live in 1946; with Carlo Maria Giulini in 1961; and with Erich Leinsdorf in 1963.
  • Solomon recorded the concerto thrice, most notably with Philharmonia Orchestra under Issay Dobrowen in 1949.
  • Egon Petri in 1937 with London Philharmonic Orchestra under Walter Goehr.
  • Vladimir Horowitz performed this piece as part of a World War II fundraising concert in 1943, with his father-in-law, the conductor Arturo Toscanini, conducting the NBC Symphony Orchestra. Two performances of Horowitz playing the concerto and Toscanini conducting were eventually released on records and CDs – the live 1943 rendition, and an earlier studio recording made in 1941.
  • Van Cliburn won the First International Tchaikovsky Competition in 1958 with this piece, surprising some people, as he was an American competing in Moscow at the height of the Cold War. He received an 8 minute standing ovation for this performance. His subsequent RCA LP recording with Kirill Kondrashin was the first classical LP to go platinum.
  • Emil Gilels recorded the concerto more than a dozen times, both live and in studio. The studio recording with Fritz Reiner and the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in 1955, and his performance in Portugal, in 1961, with the Portuguese Radio Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Pedro de Freitas Branco, are very well regarded.
  • Sviatoslav Richter in 1962 with Herbert von Karajan and the Vienna Symphony Orchestra. Richter also made recordings in 1954, 1957, 1958 and 1968.
  • Lazar Berman recorded the concerto in studio with Berlin Philharmonic under Herbert von Karajan in 1975 playing the revised version, and live in 1986 with Yuri Temirkanov playing the original version of 1875.[39]
  • Claudio Arrau recorded the concerto twice, once in 1960 with Alceo Galliera and the Philharmonia Orchestra and again in 1979 with Sir Colin Davis and the Boston Symphony Orchestra.
  • Martha Argerich recorded the concerto in 1971 with Charles Dutoit and the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. She also recorded it in 1980 with Kirill Kondrashin and the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra, as well as in 1994 with Claudio Abbado and the Berlin Philharmonic.
  • Horacio Gutiérrez’s performance of this piece at the International Tchaikovsky Competition (1970) resulted in a silver medal. He later recorded with the Baltimore Symphony and David Zinman.
  • Vladimir Ashkenazy recorded the concerto in 1963 with Lorin Maazel and the London Symphony Orchestra.
  • Evgeny Kissin performed and recorded the concerto live with Herbert von Karajan during New Year’s Eve Concert in 1988, being one of the last recordings of the maestro.
  • Stanislav Ioudenitch won the gold medal at the Van Cliburn International Piano Competition in 2001 performing this concerto with the Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra and James Conlon in the final round. His live recording of this concerto from the final round is available on the DVD The Cliburn: Playing on the Edge.
  • Andrej Hoteev recorded 2021 the original version with Vladimir Fedoseyev and the Tchaikovsky Symphony Orchestra.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Rescheduled and held a year later in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic

References[edit]

  1. ^ Maes, 75.
  2. ^ Steinberg, 480.
  3. ^ Steinberg, 477.
  4. ^ a b c Brown, Crisis Years, 18.
  5. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 16—17.
  6. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 17.
  7. ^ As quoted in Warrack, 78–79.
  8. ^ Warrack, 79.
  9. ^ Warrack, 79–80.
  10. ^ a b c Warrack, 80.
  11. ^ a b Steinberg, 476.
  12. ^ a b Margaret Ruthven Lang & Family Archived 2005-02-04 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ Alan Walker (2009). Hans von Bülow: A life and times. Oxford University Press. p. 213. ISBN 9780195368680.
  14. ^ Naxos[permanent dead link]
  15. ^ Steven Ledbetter, notes for Colorado Symphony Orchestra Archived 2008-12-16 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ^ Alan Walker (2009), p. 219
  17. ^ Tchaikovsky Research
  18. ^ Alexander Poznansky, Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man, p. 166
  19. ^ Steinberg, 475.
  20. ^ Steinberg, 475—476.
  21. ^ All Music; Rogert Dettmer biography of Malcolm Frager. Retrieved 29 May 2014
  22. ^ BBC Music Magazine – Artist Interview: Kirill Gerstein, February 2015
  23. ^ «Tchaikovsky Selection To Replace Banned Russian Anthem At Tokyo, Beijing Olympics». RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  24. ^ «WADA lawyer defends lack of blanket ban on Russia». The Japan Times. AP. 13 December 2019. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
  25. ^ «Russia Confirms It Will Appeal 4-Year Olympic Ban». Time. AP. 27 December 2019. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019.
  26. ^ Dunbar, Graham (17 December 2020). «Russia can’t use its name and flag at the next 2 Olympics». Associated Press. Retrieved 17 December 2020.
  27. ^ Borg-Wheeler 2016.
  28. ^ Frivola-Walker 2010.
  29. ^ Steinberg, 477–478.
  30. ^ See J. Norris, The Russian Piano Concerto, 1:114–151. As cited in Maes, 76.
  31. ^ «50 Russian Folk Songs (Tchaikovsky, Pyotr) — IMSLP». imslp.org. Retrieved 2021-03-20.
  32. ^ Maes, 76.
  33. ^ Brown, Crisis Years, 22–24.
  34. ^ «Brahms / Tchaikovsky: Piano Concertos (Horowitz) (1940–1941)». Naxos Records. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  35. ^ «Lang Lang / Mendelssohn, Tchaikovsky». Deutsche Grammophon. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  36. ^ Hough, Stephen (27 June 2013). «STOP PRESS: a different mistake but a more convincing solution in Tchaikovsky’s concerto». The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 1 July 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  37. ^ «125 Moments: 125 First Concert». 15 October 2016.
  38. ^ «Piano Concerto No. 1: Recordings — Tchaikovsky Research».
  39. ^ «Piano Concerto No. 1: Recordings — Tchaikovsky Research».

Sources[edit]

  • Borg-Wheeler, Phillip (2016). Tchaikovsky: Piano Concerto No 1 & Nutcracker Suite – Pyotr Tchaikovsky (1840–1893) (CD). Hyperion Records. SIGCD441.
  • Brown, David, Tchaikovsky: The Crisis Years, 1874–1878, (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1983). ISBN 0-393-01707-9.
  • Friskin, James, «The Text of Tchaikovsky’s B-flat-minor Concerto,» Music & Letters 50(2):246–251 (1969).
  • Frivola-Walker, Marina (2010). Pyotr Tchaikovsky (1840–1893): Piano Concerto No 1 in B-flat minor, Op 23 (CD). Hyperion Records. W10153.
  • Maes, Francis, tr. Arnold J. Pomerans and Erica Pomerans, A History of Russian Music: From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2002). ISBN 0-520-21815-9.
  • Norris, Jeremy, The Russian Piano Concerto (Bloomington, 1994), Vol. 1: The Nineteenth Century. ISBN 0-253-34112-4.
  • Poznansky, Alexander Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man (New York: Schirmer Books, 1991). ISBN 0-02-871885-2.
  • Serotsky, Paul (2000). Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Op. 23 (CD). Round Top Records. RTR006.
  • Steinberg, M. The Concerto: A Listener’s Guide, Oxford (1998). ISBN 0-19-510330-0.
  • Warrack, John, Tchaikovsky (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973). ISBN 0-684-13558-2.

External links[edit]

  • Media related to Piano Concerto No. 1 (Tchaikovsky) at Wikimedia Commons
  • Piano Concerto No. 1: Scores at the International Music Score Library Project
  • Tchaikovsky Research
Источник

П.И. Чайковский Концерт для фортепиано с оркестром № 1

Чайковский Концерт для фортепиано с оркестром № 1

Первый концерт для фортепиано с оркестром Петра Ильича Чайковского открыл новую эпоху в русской фортепианной музыке. Это первый образец подобного жанра в отечественной культуре. Не случайно исследователи отмечают, что произведение Чайковского значительно превышает все написанное до него по своему значению.

Историю создания Концерта для фортепиано с оркестром Чайковского, а также интересные факты и музыкальное содержание произведения читайте на нашей странице.

История создания

Практические все лето 1874 года композитор был занят сочинением своей оперы «Кузнец Вакула», успешно завершив ее в августе этого года. В то же время его начинают одолевать мысли о написании фортепианного концерта с использованием народных украинских тем. Он упоминал в своих письмах к Модесту Чайковскому о своих замыслах, указав также на то, что сочинение данного произведения идет с трудом. Несмотря на это, концерт был написан довольно быстро и уже в декабре 1874 года была готова партитура, но только лишь в переложении для двух фортепиано. Оркестрована она была в феврале 1875 года.

Петр Ильич Чайковский

К сожалению, не все друзья оценили сразу новое сочинение композитора. Николай Григорьевич Рубинштейн, для которого Чайковский и создавал свое творение, раскритиковал партитуру, заметив, что не нашел ничего положительного в ней с технической и художественной стороны. Это очень задело автора и послужило причиной разногласия между музыкантами. Маэстро строго заявил, что ничего менять в партитуре не будет.  Обо всем этом Петр Ильич спустя три года рассказал в одном из писем к Ф. фон Мекк.

Николай Григорьевич Рубинштейн

Ганс фон Бюлов, которому Чайковский в итоге посвятил свой концерт, был страстным почитателем его творчества. Впервые пианист исполнил произведение в Бостоне 25 октября 1875 года. Спустя некоторое время уже российская публика смогла познакомиться с шедевром Чайковского благодаря Г. Кроссу, который исполнил концерт в Санкт-Петербурге. Оркестром дирижировал Э. Направник. Петр Ильич при этом присутствовал в зале в качестве зрителя. Вот только композитору не понравилось исполнение и он остался крайне недоволен. 31 ноября 1875 года начинающий пианист Сергей Танеев выступил перед московской публикой с Первым концертом. Оркестром дирижировал Н. Рубинштейн, который ранее отказался его исполнять. Эта премьера прошла более удачно и публика очень тепло встретила работу композитора. Чайковский остался весьма доволен этим исполнением.

Н. Рубинштейн смог убедиться в том, что ошибался на счет произведения и уже через несколько дней после премьеры сам включил его в свой репертуар. Так, начиная с 1878 года он успешно представил его в разных городах страны. В 1879 году в Париже Николай Григорьевич и вовсе произвел настоящий фурор, блестяще исполнив сочинение Чайковского.

Интересные факты

  • Примечательно, что первоначально концерт был написан специально для исполнения Н.Г. Рубинштейном. Однако тот назвал партитуру довольно сложной и отказался от нее. В связи с этим Чайковский был вынужден исправить посвящение. Сначала он указал имя своего ученика С. Танеева. Однако потом передумал и вписал немецкого пианиста и ученика знаменитого Ф. Листа, Г. фон Бюлова. Исследователи отмечают, что причина отказа Рубинштейна скорее всего в новаторстве произведения, а никак не сложности партитуры.
  • Всего существует три редакции Первого концерта, но наибольшую популярность получила последняя, которая была сделана уже после смерти композитора. Авторская редакция была исполнена в конце XX века лишь пианистом Лазарем Берманом совместно с симфоническим оркестром Берлинского радио под управлением Ю. Темирканова.
  • Встретив негативные отзывы о своем концерте, Чайковский обратился за советом к своему коллеге Карлу Клиндворту. Тот и посоветовал ему обратить внимание на немецкого пианиста Г. фон Бюлова.
  • После успешной премьеры Концерта в Санкт-Петербурге, Чайковский, находясь под впечатлением, поспешил исправить посвящение и вписал имя С. Танеева. Но внимательно поразмышляв, он все же зачеркнул его и поставил инициалы первого исполнителя – Ганса фон Бюлова.

Сергей Танеев

  • Первый концерт до сих пор входит в обязательную программу финала Международных конкурсов им. Чайковского (с 1958 года).
  • Во время заграничных гастролей, Чайковскому пришлось исполнять Первый концерт (композитор выступал в качестве дирижера), так горячо полюбился он публикой. Даже при открытии «Карнеги Холл» в Нью-Йорке было представлено это произведение под управлением Петра Ильича.
  • Любопытно, что это сочинение звучало и на последнем концерте Чайковского, где он управлял оркестром. Партию фортепиано исполнила американская пианистка Аус дер Оэ. Помимо Первого концерта в программе была представлена его Шестая симфония. Исследователи отмечают, что подобным образом композитор простился не только с русской публикой, но и всеми современниками.

Чайковский Симфония №6 «Патетическая»

  • С. Танеев назвал сочинение первым русским концертом, что полностью соответствует действительности.
  • Любопытно, что Кюи и Ларош, после первого знакомства с Концертом, написали практически разгромные рецензии. Лишь после исполнения произведения Н. Рубинштейном они кардинально изменили свое мнение. Спустя время критики направили восторженные отзывы композитору.
  • Чайковский не был виртуозным пианистом, поэтому при написании концерта он консультировался по поводу технических подробностей с П. Пабстом.
  • Известный пианист Андрей Гаврилов высказал мысль, что на всей земле не встретишь человека, не знающего начальную тему Концерта. Этот мотив заслуженно можно назвать эмблемой композитора.

Содержание Концерта для фортепиано Чайковского

Музыкальная часть концерта основана на украинских народных мелодиях, как композитор и задумывал с самого начала.

Первая часть открывается интродукцией с блестящей темой. Она не похожа ни на что, особенная, выражающая торжество и мощь в ослепительном сиянии. Ее можно назвать по праву Гимном жизни. Главная партия основана на народном напеве лирников (песня под аккомпанемент лиры). Это не прямая цитата, Чайковский использовал лишь часть напева. Оригинал построен на жалобных интонациях, здесь же тема приобретает скерцозность. Первая часть является наиболее важной и определяет характер всего цикла.

Вторая часть совершенно иная. В ней композитор попытался совместить традиционную медленную часть и скерцо (впоследствии этот прием использовали другие композиторы). В этой части Чайковский использовал французскую народную песню, красивая и плавная начальная мелодия построена на народных интонациях. По свидетельствам Модеста Петровича, они часто в детстве напевали ее.

Финал концерта необычайно яркий, он всегда привлекал особое внимание публики.  Здесь композитор использовал украинскую хороводную песню «Выйди, выйди, Иваньку». Даже Бюлов отмечал в своих письмах, что на концертах публика требовала повторить исполнение финала.  Оригинально трактует Чайковский форму третьей части, используя рондо-сонату. В конце звучит торжественная кода, построенная на отдельных мотивах, звучащих ранее.

Исследователи отмечают близость концерта к симфонии. С этим действительно не поспоришь, ведь он наделен всеми чертами сонатно-симфонического цикла – это многогранная концепция, принцип контраста, развитые формы, яркие и индивидуальные темы.

Три редакции концерта

Первый концерт Чайковского существует в трех различных редакциях. Отчасти причина их появления была связана с недооценкой новаторских приемов композитора, при написании произведения. Вторую редакцию концерта сделал сам Чайковский. Однако эта версия, как и первая, почему-то не прижились. Спустя время появилась третья редакция, которая возникла уже после смерти композитора. Считается, что принадлежит она пианисту А. Зилоти. Тяжелые аккорды, открывающие концерт, были заменены на более мягкое арпеджио. В финале была вовсе сделана купюра, а также изменены темпы в частях. Любопытно, что именно Зилоти считали одним из лучших исполнителей Первого концерта в 80-90-х годах. Он даже лично просил композитора сделать некоторые изменения, например, сократить финал. Но Чайковский не был уверен в необходимости купюр и в итоге отдал партитуру в печать без каких-либо существенных сокращений и правок.  Все «преобразования» начались лишь после кончины автора. Именно новая редакция получила наибольшее распространение и известность.

Конкурс им. Чайковского

Пианист Андрей Хотеев в 1998 году совместно с Большим симфоническим оркестром им. Чайковского исполнил и записал на диск все произведения Петра Ильича для фортепиано с оркестром. При этом сочинения были представлены в авторской редакции. Эта запись произвела фурор и стала отправной точкой, после которой вернулись вновь первоначальные варианты концерта, сделанные самим автором. Чуть ранее пианист Джером Ловенталь также решил обратиться с авторской редакции (1989), записав ее на диск совместно с Лондонским симфоническим оркестром.

Первый концерт оказал огромное влияние на творчество других композиторов, а также на развитие всей фортепианной музыки. В настоящее время это произведение является одним из самых популярнейших сочинений Чайковского во всем мире. Оно входит в репертуар многих именитых пианистов, а также является обязательным произведением в международных конкурсах исполнителей. В нем все прекрасно, праздничные и блестящие темы удивительным образом переплетаются с лирическими, задумчивыми. Каждая из них, подобно драгоценному камню, сверкает множеством граней, искусно обработанных гениальным мастером.

Понравилась страница? Поделитесь с друзьями:

П.И. Чайковский Концерт для фортепиано с оркестром № 1

Источник

  • Концерт рахманинова номер 2
  • Копейск ремонт телефонов сотовых
  • Концерт номер один чайковский
  • Копейск пенсионный фонд телефоны
  • Концерт для фортепиано номер 1 чайковский